Showing posts with label EMERGING. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EMERGING. Show all posts

Friday, October 11, 2013

Asha to Ashes: Microsoft's emerging market conundrum

Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer (L) and his Nokia counterpart Stephen Elop introduce new Nokia phones with Microsoft's Windows 8 operating system at an event in New York in this September 5, 2012 file photo. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/Files

Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer (L) and his Nokia counterpart Stephen Elop introduce new Nokia phones with Microsoft's Windows 8 operating system at an event in New York in this September 5, 2012 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid/Files

By Jeremy Wagstaff and Devidutta Tripathy

SINGAPORE/NEW DELHI | Thu Sep 5, 2013 9:22pm EDT

SINGAPORE/NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp's acquisition of Nokia's handset business gives the software behemoth control of its main Windows smartphone partner, but leaves a question mark over the bigger business it has bought: Nokia's cheap and basic phones that still dominate emerging markets like India.

Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer has said he sees such phones - of which Nokia shipped more than 50 million last quarter - as an entree to more expensive fare.

"We look at that as an excellent feeder system into the smartphone world and a way to touch people with our services even on much lower-end devices in many parts of the world," he said in a conference call to analysts on Tuesday.

But analysts warn that's easier said than done.

The problem, said Jayanth Kolla, partner at Convergence Catalyst, an India-based telecom research and advisory firm, is that Microsoft simply lacks Nokia's retail and supply chain experience in the Finnish company's most important markets.

"The devices business, especially the non-smartphones business in emerging markets, is a completely different dynamic," he said.

Kolla pointed to the need to manage tight supply chains, distribution, and building brands through word-of-mouth. "Microsoft doesn't have it in its DNA to run operations at this level," he said.

India is a case in point. Nokia has been there since the mid 1990s and the country accounted for 7 percent of its 2012 revenue while the United States generated just 6 percent, according to Thomson Reuters data. Its India roots run deep: it has a presence in 200,000 outlets, 70,000 of which sell only its devices. One of its biggest plants in the world is in the southern city of Chennai.

For sure, Nokia has slipped in India as elsewhere: After nearly two decades as the market leader it was unseated by Samsung Electronics Co Ltd in overall sales last quarter.

But it still sold more of its more basic feature phones.

As recently as last October, market research company Nielsen ranked it the top handset brand. The Economic Times ranked it the country's third most trusted brand.

LOYALTY RUNS DEEP

In a land of frequent power cuts and rugged roads, the sturdiness and longer battery life of Nokia's phones have won it a loyal fan base - some of whom have stayed loyal when trading up.

Take Sunil Sachdeva, a Delhi-based executive, who has stuck with Nokia since his first phone. He has just bought his fifth: an upgrade to the Nokia Lumia smartphone running Microsoft's mobile operating system.

"Technology-wise they are still the best," he said of Nokia.

But Microsoft can't take such loyalty for granted. Challenging it and Samsung are local players such as Karbonn and Micromax, which are churning out smartphones running Google Inc's Android operating system for as little as $50.

Such players are also denting Nokia's efforts to build its Asha brand, touchscreen devices perched somewhere between a feature phone and a smartphone.

Nokia shipped 4.3 million Asha phones globally in the second quarter of this year, down from 5.0 million the previous quarter.

"The sales performance of the Asha line has been quite poor," said Sameer Singh, Hyderabad-based analyst at BitChemy Ventures, an investor in local startups. "With increasing competition from the low-end smartphone vendors, I'm unsure how long that business will last."

That leaves the cheap seats. Singh estimates that the Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa accounted for two-thirds of Nokia's feature phone volumes in the last quarter, at an average selling price of between 25 to 30 euros ($32.99 to $39.59).

"I don't see how Microsoft can really leverage this volume," he said. "The market is extremely price sensitive and margins are racing into negative territory."

TOO BIG TO IGNORE

The quandary for Microsoft is that while the basic phone market may be declining, it may simply be too big to ignore.

"If you look at markets like India and Indonesia, more than 70 percent of the volume comes from the feature phone business," Anshul Gupta, principal research analyst at Gartner said. "It's still a significant part of the overall market."

That means that if Microsoft wants to herd this market up the value chain to its Windows phones, it needs to keep the Nokia and Asha brands afloat - while also narrowing the price gap between its smartphones and the feature phones and cheap smartphones.

Microsoft has hinted that lowering prices of smartphones would be a priority. The Windows Phone series includes the top-end Lumia 1020, which comes with a 41-megapixel camera, while it also sells simpler models such as the Lumia 610 and 620 aimed at first-time smartphone buyers.

"The lower price phone is a strategic initiative for the next Windows Phone release," Terry Myerson, vice president of operating systems said on the same conference call, while declining to provide details.

An option for Microsoft, analysts said, would be to shoe-horn services like Bing search, Outlook webmail and Skype, the Internet telephony and messaging application, into the lower-end phones as a way to drive traffic to those services and make the devices more appealing.

"So you can bundle services with these low-end products and that way you can reach a wider audience," said Finland-based Nordea Markets analyst Sami Sarkamies.

But in the meantime Microsoft needs to brace for assault on all fronts as emerging market rivals see an opportunity to eat further into Nokia's market share. In India, said Convergent Catalyst's Kolla, cheap local Android brands have been held back by Nokia's strong promotion of its mid-tier Asha brand.

"Now, I expect them to pounce," he said. ($1 = 0.7577 euros)

(Reporting By Jeremy Wagstaff in Singapore, Devidutta Tripathy in New Delhi, Bill Rigby in Seattle, Ritsuko Ando in Helsinki; Editing by Emily Kaiser)


View the original article here

Monday, September 30, 2013

Bumpy road won't deter Sanofi's push into emerging markets

Chris Viehbacher, Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi, attends the company's 2012 annual results presentation in Paris February 7, 2013. REUTERS/Jacky Naegelen


Chris Viehbacher, Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi, attends the company's 2012 annual results presentation in Paris February 7, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jacky Naegelen

By Sumeet Chatterjee


MUMBAI | Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:11am EDT


MUMBAI (Reuters) - French drugmaker Sanofi SA will not be deterred from expanding in emerging markets through acquisitions despite government crackdowns on pricing and closer scrutiny of western pharmaceutical companies' business practices, its CEO said.


Multinational drugmakers such as Pfizer Inc, Sanofi and AstraZeneca PLC have depended on rising demand in emerging markets as sales in the developed economies slow due to a wave of patent expirations on top-selling drugs.


"Emerging markets has six billion people and I think the marketplace will be bumpy on occasions, but the need for healthcare is undeniable," Sanofi Chief Executive Chris Viehbacher told reporters in Mumbai on Monday.


"For the longer term I continue to believe in the importance (not just) from the healthcare point of view but also from the business point of view in emerging markets," he said.


Sanofi's India unit was believed to be one of the bidders for the domestic drug formulations business of India's Elder Pharmaceuticals Ltd for $400 million-$450 million, sources had told Reuters in July.


Viehbacher declined to comment on the Elder deal, but said the company would continue to look for acquisition opportunities in the emerging markets, which accounts for a third of Sanofi's revenue, including in India.


Western drugmakers who covet a bigger share of India's fast-growing $13 billion drugs market have been frustrated by a series of decisions on intellectual property and pricing.


India in August revoked a patent granted to GlaxoSmithKline for breast cancer drug Tykerb, a decision that followed a landmark court ruling disallowing patents for incremental innovations that was a blow to global pharmaceutical firms.


The decision was the latest in a series of rulings on intellectual property and pricing in India that have frustrated attempts by Western drugmakers to sell their medicines.


Viehbacher said instead of focusing on lowering prices of drugs, the Indian authorities should focus on improving access to quality healthcare and invest in innovation. India spends about 5 percent of its gross domestic product on healthcare.


CHINA CRACKDOWN


The pharmaceutical industry should support China's efforts to curb corruption, Viehbacher said, with a crackdown on bribery in the country's drug sector hurting sales at a number of firms.


With China's healthcare spending forecast to nearly triple to $1 trillion by 2020 from $357 billion in 2011, according to consulting firm McKinsey, China is a magnet for makers of medicines and medical equipment.


However, a string of investigations and visits by authorities to the China-based offices of global firms has prompted businesses to step up internal compliance and rein in sales teams.


"I think the Chinese government's approach to reduce corruption has to be supported by all of us. As companies, all of us are absolutely proactively cooperating with the agencies who are investigating," Viehbacher said.


Sanofi said in August that one of its 11 regional offices in China had been visited by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) in Shenyang, but added it was not aware of the purpose of the visit from the agency.


Industry insiders expect its China drug sales growth to slow sharply or even reverse in the third quarter after a 14 percent year-on-year rise in the three months to end-June.


(Reporting by Sumeet Chatterjee; editing by David Evans)


View the original article here

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Andreessen: Android poised to explode in emerging markets

Marc Andressen on Bloomberg

Bloomberg recently TV interviewed Marc Andreessen, the guy who’s famous for co-founding Netscape and currently works as a VC at his own Silicon Valley VC shop, Andreessen Horowitz.

Towards the end of the interview, he was asked what’s big for 2013. After saying that tablet growth would still be huge, he followed up with this quote:

"The other thing I think I'd point to is the $50 Android smartphone is about to hit the market worldwide. Smartphones are about to be put in the hands of another 3 billion people who don't have them. And that's probably the single biggest thing that's happening right now."

In the developed world, we tend to think of Android as Samsung Galaxy S3 and S4, the new HTC One, maybe some Sony, and throw Motorola in for good measure. Yeah, we hear about cheaper hardware, but rarely do we stop to think about what it means to emerging markets.

And, yes, Android is used for some pretty awesome and powerful smartphone hardware. But Android is also about to kill the feature phone. Dead. This means Nokia’s Symbian, and every other less-powerful proprietary feature phone out there.  They are all toast. (Insert BlackBerry and Windows Phone jokes here. But that's not what we're talking about.)

Who’s going to make these phones? There are already lesser-known brands in India and China cranking out cheap Android phones. And then there’s Samsung and LG, who make all sorts of hardware that we never hear about. Same went for Motorola, too.

What we’re talking about here is the commoditization of smartphones at the low end of the market and taking the carriers out of the equation. If you’re old enough to remember how regular household landline phones were sold a couple of decades ago, you basically walked into the phone company’s retail store to buy (or even rent) a phone. Eventually the quality of other products (sold in other stores) improved, and phone companies stopped trying to control the sale of phones. 

I remember 10 years ago talking to my friends in the investing community about how this trend would eventually repeat itself in the land of mobile. But with advancing radio technologies (2G, then EDGE, then UMTS, then HSPA, then HSPA+, and finally LTE), it never really happened. 

In fact, back in those days when a new radio technology was deployed by carriers it was often a year or two before handsets hit the market to take advantage of the technology. Remember how long it took for 3G phones to hit? It was way after UMTS deployment began. 

But today these technologies are fairly mature. And in developed markets where 2G, 2.5G and sometimes 3G are available, the radio code is stable, the chipsets are cheap, and there is no good reason for carriers to be a bottleneck to cheap access to decent smartphones. So it makes sense that in emerging markets, during 2013 and 2014, the next 3 billion people are going to start to become connected to the mobile Internet. The ramifications of this are pretty awesome.  It’s widely known that wireless internet connectivity helps boost a country’s GDP faster than just about anything else. 

Some might say that Google (and Android), are playing a big factor in catching these developing markets up to where they should be. I think that’s true.  And I also think it will be very profitable for Google to do this. Its services drive revenue, and Google is pretty much set to dominate in emerging markets.

Think of how tough this must be for Microsoft. When Nokia partnered with the Redmond giant, they HAD to know Symbian was going to disappear at the low end of the market within a few years. They had a chance to push Windows into the low end quickly, to avoid this brutal ending.  But they didn’t do it. They entered the race at the top of the market, and things aren’t going well.

Sadly for Microsoft, I think we’re now seeing a story unfold where Google wins the low end, Google and Apple are winning the top end, and everyone else is fighting for a relevance, or ownership of a niche segment of the market.

Chris Umiastowski
"Chris Umiastowski is a former sell-side equity analyst at Orion Securities and TD Securities. Before that, he was an engineer for Nortel Networks. Chris is co-host of the Mobile Nations Stock Talk podcast."

View the original article here

Free Facebook Likes